The Albanese government is under scrutiny for failing to conduct on-site investigations before halting a proposed million-dollar goldmine in Blayney, New South Wales. The decision, influenced by an Indigenous activist group’s last-minute claims, has sparked debate over procedural integrity and heritage preservation.
The McPhillamys mine, spearheaded by Regis Resources, now faces a critical redesign phase to align with Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek’s directive to protect the cultural heritage of the region. The company anticipates clarity on the project’s future by mid-year.
Government Oversight Questioned
A Senate inquiry revealed that the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment, and Water (DCCEEW) did not dispatch staff to the site during the heritage inspection process, citing resource constraints. This omission occurred despite the rejection of recommendations from an independent expert, Ruth Elvin, who assessed the site during the pandemic and found no reason to block the development.
Ms Plibersek based her decision on late-stage evidence submitted by a splinter Indigenous group, citing the cultural significance of the blue-banded bee Dreaming. However, this evidence was never independently verified, raising concerns about procedural rigour.
Regis Resources Responds
Regis Resources CEO Jim Beyer announced during a quarterly earnings call that the company has commenced an exhaustive review of alternative solutions for tailings storage to comply with heritage mandates.
“We expect to determine within six months whether alternative options are feasible,” Mr Beyer said. “This is a complex process, and we are employing advanced methods to ensure no viable solution is overlooked.”
Legal and Strategic Implications
Regis Resources has also initiated Federal Court proceedings against Ms Plibersek, seeking a judicial review of her decision-making process. The first hearing is scheduled for March 4, with the company questioning the late drafting of her decision’s rationale.
The outcome of these legal and strategic efforts will not only determine the future of the McPhillamys project but also set a precedent for how heritage claims are assessed in major infrastructure developments.
Add Comment