Cooper Grace Ward’s Litigation team highlights a recent court decision on a slip incident that mining work environments don’t need to be pristine.
The case illustrates that all work has some danger and employers are entitled to manage, instead of eliminating, some risks.
Facts of the slip and trip incident
The plaintiff was an experienced coal miner, who suffered an injury descending a ladder that was attached to a Load Haul Dump (LHD) after re-watering it. How he fell was in dispute, but the Court found he must not have descended in the correct (maintaining three points of contact) and cautious manner.
The refuelling and rewatering were normally performed above ground. However, occasionally it was necessary to do it underground in a bay that attracted groundwater and diesel, which the plaintiff knew would make his boots slippery.
Two months before the incident, the employer had modified the engine cover on the LHD. The plaintiff therefore needed to use a ladder to rewater when previously he could do it while standing on the ground.
The employer had not carried out a risk assessment in relation to the modifications. However, the plaintiff had been trained in how to descend a ladder maintaining three points of contact.
The plaintiff called expert evidence from an occupational health and safety expert, who made various criticisms of the system of work including that:
- a risk assessment had not been conducted
- steps or a platform should have been installed instead of a ladder
- the task should have been performed above ground
- the engine compartment cover should not have been modified in the first place.
The employer called evidence from a mining engineer who said that the slippery conditions were unavoidable and that it was not practical or reasonable to expect pristine spill-free conditions in a temporary location. He further observed that the ‘subtask’ of dismounting could be safely performed by maintaining three points of contact, even with slippery feet.
The court’s decision
In dismissing the plaintiff’s claim, Justice Wright found:
- If a risk assessment had been carried out, it would have concluded that the increase in risk ‘would have been reasonably and appropriately managed’ by the provision of a ladder with handholds and appropriate training. This is what had been done anyway.
- Given the magnitude of the risk and the probability of its occurrence, a reasonable person would not have implemented the more elaborate measures identified by the plaintiff’s expert including installing steps. Installing a ladder was enough.
- As the ladder with handholds was available, the employer did not need to eliminate the risk by conducting rewatering above ground or ensuring the engine was accessible from ground level.
If the plaintiff had succeeded, there is no doubt his award would have been substantial – the Court assessed future economic loss alone at $1,000 per week to retirement age.
About Cooper Grace Ward
Cooper Grace Ward was established in 1980 and has quickly become one of the largest independent Brisbane based law firms, with a team of 200 people. The company offers a full range of commercial legal services to clients focusing particularly in the areas of corporate and commercial, property, litigation, insurance and family law. Key practice areas are among the largest Brisbane-based teams in their respective areas.
Cooper Grace Ward is known for its outstanding client service and internal culture. The company sees that both of those things are interrelated. Understand that practising law is not just about knowing the law; it is also about having people who are able to work with others to achieve the best outcomes for clients. This sets Cooper Grace Ward apart from other law firms.
Read more Mining Safety News